Skip to main content
Source-based comparison

Proton VPN vs Mullvad: Privacy, Features and Pricing Comparison

Compare Proton VPN and Mullvad without editorial scores, using privacy, pricing, independent audits, open-source information, device support and jurisdiction.

This comparison does not declare an editorial score, winner or laboratory result. It places public, verifiable provider information side by side using the same fields.

Read the methodology

Pricing and provider features can change. Information on this page is compiled from official provider sources and, where available, independent verification; it is not a laboratory test or user rating. Methodology · Advertising disclosure

Proton VPN

For privacy-focused users

Swiss jurisdiction, open-source clients and annual independent no-logs audits published by the provider make this a strong option for privacy-first users.

Mullvad

Privacy-first option with no affiliate relationship

An option for privacy-first users — per provider policy, an anonymous account system, flat pricing and no affiliate programme. No financial link with this site; included as a source-based reference profile for transparency.

Compare features side by side

Proton VPNMullvad
Starting priceOfficial siteOfficial site
JurisdictionSwitzerlandSweden
Independent auditAnnual Securitum no-logs auditAssured AB independent audits
Server / network information5,400+ servers · 110+ countries700+ servers · 49 countries
Device support10 devices5 devices
Open sourceYesYes
Refund period30 days30 days

Proton VPN

Documented notable points

  • Per provider, all clients are open source and inspectable on GitHub
  • Per provider reports, an independent no-logs audit is performed annually
  • Swiss jurisdiction — local data-protection laws are relatively strict
  • Per provider, a free plan with unlimited bandwidth

Points to consider

  • Some advanced features are available only on paid plans
  • Location selection is limited on the free plan
  • Renewal price climbs noticeably

Mullvad

Documented notable points

  • Per provider policy, no username or email required — only an account number
  • Per provider, accepts cash payment by mail
  • Per provider, clients are open source and inspectable on GitHub
  • Per provider policy, a flat €5/month price (no discounts/promotions)

Points to consider

  • Lower server count than rivals
  • Not optimised for streaming
  • Customer support is email-only